Examining the Effect of School Principals' Decision-Making Styles on Teachers' Job Satisfaction
Okul Müdürlerinin Karar Verme Stillerinin Öğretmenlerin İş Doyumuna Etkisinin İncelenmesi
Abstract views: 48 / PDF downloads: 85
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10686454Keywords:
Job satisfaction, decision-making stylesAbstract
In this research, according to the opinions of the teachers; It was aimed to examine the effect of school principals' decision-making styles on teachers' job satisfaction. The researchers used the relational screening method. In addition, the level of job satisfaction and decision-making styles was above average. In this case, the decision-making styles and job satisfaction levels perceived by the participants are quite high. According to teachers' perceptions, decision-making styles and individual job performance perceptions differ between men and women; It was revealed that it did not change according to married and single people. Again, the difference between the job satisfaction scale and the arithmetic averages of the age groups was not found to be statistically significant. However, the difference between the decision-making styles scale and the arithmetic averages of the age groups was found to be statistically significant. Accordingly, it was concluded that the group between the ages of 31 and 40 perceived their perception of decision-making styles higher than the group aged 41 and over. Additionally, the difference between the job satisfaction scale and the arithmetic averages of the professional experience groups was not found statistically significant. However, the difference between the decision-making styles scale and the arithmetic averages of the professional experience groups was found to be statistically significant. Accordingly, it was concluded that the decision-making styles perception of the 6-10 years group was higher than the 1-5 years, 11-15 years and 16 years and above professional experience groups. Again, in line with the teachers' opinions, there was no difference in the decision-making styles scale according to their educational background. However, there was a statistical difference in job satisfaction perceptions. Accordingly, the job satisfaction perceptions of postgraduate teachers were higher than those of undergraduate teachers. Finally, there is no statistical relationship between the decision-making styles of the teachers within the scope of the research and their job satisfaction. In line with the teachers' opinions, school principals' perceptions of decision-making styles do not significantly predict their perceptions of job satisfaction. In other words, it appears that the change in perceptions of decision-making styles does not affect teachers' perceptions of job satisfaction.
References
Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., Williams, T. A., Camm, J. D., & Cochran, J. J. (2016). introduction to management science: Quantitative approaches to decision making. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Aziri, B. (2011). Job satisfaction: A literature review. Management Research and Practice, 77-86.
Başol, O., & Çömlekçi, M. F. (2020). İş Tatmini Ölçeğinin uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 17-31.
Demirtaş, Z. (2010). Teachers' job satisfaction levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1069-1073.
Dilekçi, Ü. (2022). Teacher autonomy as a predictor of job satisfaction. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 328-337.
Evans, L. (1997). Addressing problems of conceptualization and construct validity in researching teachers' job satisfaction. Educational Research, 319-331.
Findlay, N. M. (2015). Discretion in student discipline: Insight into elementary principals’ decision making. Educational Administration Quarterly, 472-507.
Gülbahar, B. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between teachers' supervisor support, work engagement, school effectiveness and job satisfaction perceptions. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 1-20.
Kelchtermans, G., Piot, L., & Ballet, K. (2011). The lucid loneliness of the gatekeeper: Exploring the emotional dimension in principals' work lives. Oxford Review of Education, 93-108.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2012). Organizational Behavior (15th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2021). Teacher burnout: Relations between dimensions of burnout, perceived school context, job satisfaction and motivation for teaching. A longitudinal stud. Teachers and Teaching, 602-616.
Spillane, J., & Kenney, A. W. (2012). School administration in a changing education sector: The U.S experience. Journal of Educational Administration, 541-561.
Şimşek, H., & Yıldırım, A. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston : Pearson.
Taşdelen, A. (2002). Öğretmen Adaylarının Farklı Psiko-Sosyal Değişkenlere Göre Karar Verme Stilleri. Doktora Tezi. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Taubman, P. M. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York: Routledge.
Tekin, Y. F. (2018). Okul müdürlerinin karar verme stilleri ile iletişim becerileri arasındaki ilişki: karma bir uygulama (Aydın ili örneği). Aydın: Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Temur, Ö. F. (2012). Öğretmen algılarına göre yöneticilerin karar verme stillerinin öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığına etkisi (Rize İli Örneği). Rize: Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Walter, J., Kellermanns, F. W., & Lechner, C. (2012). Decision making within and between organizations rationality, politics, and alliance performance. Journal of Management, 1582-1610.
Weick, K. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization. Volume 2: The impermanent organization. New York: John Wiley.
Yıldız, K. (2012). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin karar verme stilleri. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 104-133.
Zencirkıran, M., & Keser, A. (2018). Örgütsel davranış. Bursa: Dora Yayıncılık.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Management and Educational Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.