Plagiarism and Artificial Intelligence Policy
Plagiarism and Artificial Intelligence Policy
Plagiarism and Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy
1. General Principles
Journal of Management and Educational Sciences (JMEDUSCI) upholds the principles of academic integrity, research ethics, and scientific reliability as fundamental elements of its publication processes.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are evaluated in terms of ethical principles regarding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, inappropriate similarity, copyright infringements, and the use of generative artificial intelligence.
JMEDUSCI bases these processes on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the DOAJ Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing, the ICMJE, and relevant international publishing standards.
2. Similarity (Plagiarism) Check
All articles submitted to the journal are reviewed using similarity detection software during the editorial pre-screening phase.
It is recommended that similarity reports be obtained from reliable software such as:
- iThenticate
- Turnitin (where appropriate)
- İntihal.Net
.
The overall similarity rate is expected to not exceed 20%.
However, the editor also evaluates not only the total similarity rate but also:
- high similarity from a single source,
- long consecutive text similarities,
- inappropriate citations,
- and paraphrases without proper attribution.
3. Unacceptable Ethical Violations
The following situations are considered violations of publication ethics:
- Plagiarism
- Self-plagiarism
- Data fabrication
- Data falsification
- Duplicate publication
- Salami slicing
- Quoting without citing the source
- Using fabricated or unverifiable sources
- Unauthorized use of another person’s ideas, tables, figures, or images
Manuscripts found to contain ethical violations are rejected without entering the peer review process.
If an ethical violation is detected after publication, the necessary corrections or retraction procedures are applied in accordance with COPE principles.
4. Works Derived from Theses and Conference Papers
Works derived from master’s or doctoral theses may be accepted for review.
However, authors must
- indicate that the work is derived from a thesis,
- the thesis title,
- the university,
- and the year
in the Author Information Form at the time of submission.
Similarly,
for studies expanded from papers presented at conferences, symposia, or workshops, the title of the paper, the event, and the date must be clearly stated.
5. Use of Artificial Intelligence
JMEDUSCI supports the responsible and transparent use of generative artificial intelligence tools in academic work.
Authors may use the following AI systems—
- ChatGPT
- Gemini
- Claude
- Microsoft Copilot
- Perplexity
- DeepSeek
- GitHub Copilot
- Grammarly AI
- Paperpal
- Writefull
and similar AI systems—
- for language editing,
- spelling checks,
- code development,
- statistical programming support,
- and text editing.
6. Declaration of AI Use
6. Declaration of AI Use
If generative AI tools were used during the preparation of the article, this must be clearly stated at the end of the article under the following heading.
Artificial Intelligence Disclosure Statement
Example:
ChatGPT (OpenAI) was used in this study for language editing. Content generated by artificial intelligence has been verified by the authors, and scientific responsibility lies entirely with the authors.
7. Artificial Intelligence Cannot Be an Author
Generative artificial intelligence systems may not be listed as:
- author,
- co-author,
- corresponding author
.
Artificial intelligence systems:
- do not hold copyright,
- cannot assume ethical responsibility,
- and cannot make a conflict of interest disclosure.
Therefore, only real persons are accepted as authors.
8. Content Generated by Artificial Intelligence
Authors
are responsible for verifying the accuracy of all content generated by artificial intelligence.
Content generated by artificial intelligence that contains:
- incorrect information,
- fabricated sources,
- unverified data,
- or flawed analyses
is considered a violation of publication ethics.
9. Use of Artificial Intelligence by Reviewers and Editors
Reviewers and editors;
may not upload unpublished manuscripts submitted to them for review to any generative artificial intelligence system.
Information obtained during the peer review process is confidential and may not be shared with third-party systems.
10. Final Provisions
Should JMEDUSCI detect an ethical violation related to plagiarism or the use of artificial intelligence, it reserves the right to:
- reject the article,
- request revisions,
- suspend the review process,
- retract the article,
- and, when necessary, notify the author’s affiliated institution.
This policy may be updated as necessary to protect scientific integrity and publication ethics.
This policy may be updated as necessary to safeguard scientific integrity and publication ethics.





