Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in Online (Web-Based) and Face-to-Face Courses

Çevrimiçi (Web Tabanlı) ve Yüz Yüze Derslerde Öğrenci Performansının Karşılaştırmalı Analizi


Abstract views: 34 / PDF downloads: 15

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13099888

Keywords:

Traditional teaching, web-based teaching, web-supported teaching

Abstract

In this research, web-supported teaching, web-based teaching and traditional teaching methods are compared in terms of their effects on student success. The research design used in the study is a 3x2 split-plot (mixed) design. According to the research results; It was determined that there was an increase in the success of the groups in which traditional, web-based and web-assisted teaching methods were applied, according to the tests applied before and after the experiment. It was determined that there was no difference between the pre-test results in all three groups where different teaching methods were applied. It was determined that there was a difference between the post-test results of the three different groups, to which different teaching methods were applied, after the experiment. In other words, there is a difference in post-test applications between groups in terms of student success. It is seen that the third group, for which the web-based teaching method was applied for the Spreadsheets (MS Excel) module, was the most successful group, the second group, for which the web-based teaching method was applied, was the second successful group, and the first group, for which the traditional teaching method was applied, was the least successful group. In the Information and Communication (MS Outlook) module, it was determined that there was an increase in the success of the groups in which traditional, web-based and web-assisted teaching methods were applied, according to the tests applied before and after the experiment. It was determined that there was no difference between the pre-test results in all three groups where different teaching methods were applied. In other words, there is no difference in terms of student achievement between groups. It was determined that there was no difference between the post-test results of the groups to which the traditional and web-based teaching method was applied in terms of student success among the groups to which different teaching methods were applied, but there was a difference between the post-test results of the groups to which the web-assisted teaching method and both traditional and web-based teaching methods were applied. For the Information and Communication (MS Outlook) module, it is seen that the third group, for which the web-based teaching method was applied, was the most successful group, and there was no difference between the success of the second group, for which the web-based teaching method was applied, and the first group, for which the traditional teaching method was applied.

References

Aggarwal, A. (2000). Web-based Learning and Teaching Technolo gies: Opportunities and Challenges. London : Idea Group Publishing.

Akpınar, Y. (2001). Internet Üzerinde Eğitim ve Etkileşimlilik. http://dergi.tbd.org.tr/yazarlar/02072001/yavuz_akpinar.htm adresinden alındı

Azak, A., Sulak, S. .., & Güner, H.E. (2020). Analysis of University Students' Views and Usage Levels of Web 2.0 Tools in Terms of Various Variables. Uluslararası İşletme ve Sosyal Bilimler Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 609–623.

Cook, D. (2007). Web-based learning: Pros, cons and controversies. Clinical Medicine, 37–42.

Garg, A., & Kapil, A. (2010). Potable extended cache memory to reduce web traffic. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 4744–4750.

Garg, A., Sharma, A., & Garg, N. (2020). Impact of Web Based Learning and Teaching in Higher Education in India. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 2692–2697.

Güner, H. E. (2021). Ankara Üniversitesi bilgisayar programcılığı öğretim programlarının değerlendirilmesi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.

Güner, H. E., Yağcı, M., & Azak, A. (2021). Bilişim Teknolojileri ve Yazılım Dersi Öğretiminde Eğitsel Oyun Yazılımı Destekli Öğretimin Öğrencilerin Başarıları Üzerindeki Etkisi. . Türk Akademik Yayınlar Dergisi, 118-134.

Jain, S. (2024). Online Education in India: Trends & Future Prospects. https://www.shiksha.com/mba/articles/online-education-in-india-trends-future-prospects-blogId-14763 adresinden alındı

Karakaya, M. (2018). Sınıftaki Öğretime Ve Öğrenci Öğrenmelerine Okul Müdürü Liderliğinin Etkisi: Öğrenmede Aracı Yolların İncelenmesi Mahmut Karakaya . Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü .

Kay, R., Knaack, L., & Petrarca, D. (2009). Exploring teachers per ceptions of web-based learning tools. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 27–50.

Kesici Taş, H. (2007). Web Destekli, Web Tabanlı Ve Geleneksel Öğretim Yöntemlerinin Öğrenci Başarısına Etkisinin Karşılaştırılması . Ankara : Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tez .

Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners’ factors toward e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 1906-1920.

McCombs, B. L. (2000). Reducing the achievement gap. Society, 29-39.

McKimm, J., Jollie, C., & Cantillon, P. (2003). Web based learning. BMJ Clinical review, 870-874.

Nordin, A., & Alias, N. (2013). Web-based teaching and learning approach (WBTLA) usability in institutions of higher learning in malaysia. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 44–55.

Ramma, Y., Bholoa, A., Watts, M., & Nadal, P. (2017). Teach ing and learning physics using technology: Making a case for the affective domain. Education Inquiry, 210–236.

Shah, D. (2024). By The Numbers: MOOCs in 2019. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2019/ adresinden alındı

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000). Assessment for distance education. Teaching and learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education., 1-20.

Steffes, E. M., & Duverger, P. (2012). Edutainment with videos and its positive effect on long term memory. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 1-10.

Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 252–275.

Şimşek, H., & Yıldırım, A. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.

Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston : Pearson.

Tseng, C.-J., & Chen , T.-C. (2020). Impact of Web-Based Teaching on the Learning Performance of Education and Training in the Service Industry during COVID-19. Contemporary Educatıonal Technology, 1-8.

Ünsal, H. (2004). Web Destekli Eğitim, Elektronik Öğrenme ve Web Öğretim Programlarındaki Çeşitli Ders Modelleri. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2004.

Wasim, J., Sharma, S., Khan , I., & Siddiqui, J. (2014). Web based learning. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 446– 449.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-27

How to Cite

Kesici Taş, H., & Güner, H. E. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in Online (Web-Based) and Face-to-Face Courses: Çevrimiçi (Web Tabanlı) ve Yüz Yüze Derslerde Öğrenci Performansının Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Journal of Management and Educational Sciences, 3(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13099888

Issue

Section

Articles