The Effect of Teachers' Job Satisfaction Levels on Organizational Presenteeism
Öğretmenlerin İş Doyumu Düzeylerinin Örgütsel Presenteeism Üzerindeki Etkisi
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of teachers' job satisfaction levels on organizational presenteeism. The research was conducted on a total of 327 teachers working in the provinces of Izmir, Antalya, and Şanlıurfa during the 2024–2025 academic year. A correlational survey model, one of the quantitative research methods, was used in the study. The Socio-Demographic Information Form, Job Satisfaction Survey, and Organizational Presenteeism Scale were used as data collection tools. The data obtained were analyzed using the SPSS 25.0 software package; descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression analyses were applied. According to the research findings, teachers' levels of organizational presenteeism were found to be moderate, while their levels of job satisfaction were relatively high. No significant differences were found in job satisfaction and organizational presenteeism scores based on gender, marital status, and education level variables. In contrast, significant differences were found in organizational presenteeism levels based on age and professional experience variables. Regression analysis results showed that some sub-dimensions of job satisfaction (particularly salary, benefits, and coworkers) were significant predictors of organizational presenteeism. However, a low and statistically insignificant relationship was found between overall job satisfaction and organizational presenteeism. In conclusion, it was found that organizational presenteeism behaviors, which limit teachers' functional performance despite their physical presence in schools, are particularly related to working conditions and perceptions of organizational support. In this context, it is considered that institutional improvements aimed at increasing teachers' job satisfaction may be effective in reducing presenteeism behaviors.
Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğretmenlerin iş doyumu düzeylerinin örgütsel presenteeism üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Araştırma, 2024–2025 eğitim-öğretim döneminde İzmir, Antalya ve Şanlıurfa illerinde görev yapan toplam 327 öğretmen üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak Sosyo-Demografik Bilgi Formu, İş Doyumu Ölçeği (Job Satisfaction Survey) ve Örgütsel Presenteeism Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS 25.0 paket programı aracılığıyla analiz edilmiş; betimsel istatistikler, bağımsız örneklem t-testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA), Pearson korelasyon ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizleri uygulanmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre öğretmenlerin örgütsel presenteeism düzeyleri orta düzeyde, iş doyumu düzeyleri ise görece yüksek bulunmuştur. Cinsiyet, medeni durum ve öğrenim düzeyi değişkenlerine göre iş doyumu ve örgütsel presenteeism puanlarında anlamlı bir farklılık saptanmamıştır. Buna karşılık, yaş ve mesleki deneyim değişkenlerine göre örgütsel presenteeism düzeylerinde anlamlı farklılıklar olduğu belirlenmiştir. Regresyon analizi sonuçları, iş doyumunun bazı alt boyutlarının (özellikle ücret, yan haklar ve iş arkadaşları) örgütsel presenteeism üzerinde anlamlı yordayıcılar olduğunu göstermiştir. Ancak genel iş doyumu ile örgütsel presenteeism arasında düşük ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmayan bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, öğretmenlerin okullarda fiziksel olarak bulunmalarına rağmen işlevsel performanslarını sınırlayan örgütsel presenteeism davranışlarının, özellikle çalışma koşulları ve örgütsel destek algılarıyla ilişkili olduğu görülmektedir. Bu bağlamda, öğretmenlerin iş doyumunu artırmaya yönelik kurumsal iyileştirmelerin, presenteeism davranışlarının azaltılmasında etkili olabileceği değerlendirilmektedir.
Abasilim. U. D.. Salau. O. P.. ve Falola. O. H. (2015). Toward an understanding of presenteeism and its effects in the workplace. Journal of Public Administration ve Management. 1(1). 74–85.
Akdoğan. A.. Bayram. A.. ve Harmancı. Y. K. (2018). Algılanan örgütsel adalet ve işte var olamama (presenteeism) ilişkisinde stresin aracı rolü. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 7(2). 197–211.
Allemann. A.. Siebenhüner. K.. ve Hämmig. O. (2019). Predictors of presenteeism among hospital employees—a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study in switzerland. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 61(12). 1004-1010. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000001721
Ammendolia, C., Côté, P., Cancelliere, C., Cassidy, J., Hartvigsen, J., Boyle, E., & Amick, B. (2016). Healthy and productive workers: Using intervention mapping to design a workplace health promotion and wellness program to improve presenteeism. BMC Public Health, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3843-x
Ammendolia. C.. Côté. P.. Cancelliere. C.. Cassidy. J.. Hartvigsen. J.. Boyle. E.. … ve Amick. B. (2016). Healthy and productive workers: using intervention mapping to design a workplace health promotion and wellness program to improve presenteeism. BMC Public Health. 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3843-x
Avcı. N. (2023). Örgütsel sinizm. örgütsel sessizlik. işte sözde var olma ve sessiz istifa arasındaki ilişkiler: İstanbul Maltepe Belediyesi örneği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi. 14(39). 968–989.
Baker‐McClearn. D.. Greasley. K.. Dale. J.. ve Griffith. F. (2010). Absence management and presenteeism: The pressures on employees to attend work and the impact of attendance on performance. Human Resource Management Journal. 20(3). 311–328.
Chang, Y., Su, C., Chen, R., Yeh, C., Huang, P., Chen, C., & Chu, M. (2015). Association between organization culture, health status, and presenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57(7), 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000439
Çelik. M.. ve Durmuş. A. (2024). İş performansında presenteizmin etkisi: İş yerinde mutluluğun aracılık rolü. Mevzu–Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. (12). 1027–1064.
Çiftçi. B. (2010). İşte var ol(ama)ma sorunu ve işletmelerin uygulayabileceği çözüm önerileri. Çalışma ve Toplum. 1(24). 153–174.
d’Errico, A., Viotti, S., Baratti, A., Mottura, B., Barocelli, A., Tagna, M., & Converso, D. (2013). Low back pain and associated presenteeism among hospital nursing staff. Journal of Occupational Health, 55(4), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.12-0261-oa
Demerouti, E., Blanc, P. M. L., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hox, J. (2009). Present but sick: A three-wave study on job demands, presenteeism and burnout. Career Development International, 14(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910933574
Dewa. C. S.. McDaid. D.. ve Ettner. S. L. (2007). An international perspective on worker mental health problems: Who bears the burden and how are costs addressed? Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 52(6). 346–356.
Dietz. C.. ve Scheel. T. (2017). Leadership and presenteeism among scientific staff: The role of accumulation of work and time pressure. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 1885. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01885
Ferreira. P.. Barros. A.. Pereira. N.. Marques‐Pinto. A.. ve Simão. A. (2021). How presenteeism shaped teacher burnout in cyberbullying among students during the covid-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.745252
Gilbreath. B.. ve Karimi. L. (2012). Supervisor behavior and employee presenteeism. International Journal of Leadership Studies. 7(1). 114–131.
Hair. J. F.. Black. W. C.. Babin. B. J.. Anderson. R. E.. ve Tatham. R. L. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
Islam, M., Amin, M., Feranita, F., & Winterton, J. (2023). Coming to work with an illness: The role of high-involvement work systems and individual competence on presenteeism. Employee Relations, 46(3), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2022-0491
Johns. G. (2010). Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 31(4). 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.630
Karagöz. Ş.. ve Bektaş. M. (2020). Presenteeism’in tükenmişliğe etkisi: Bir alan araştırması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 25(4). 385–401.
Karanika-Murray. M.. Pontes. H. M.. Griffiths. M. D.. ve Biron. C. (2015). Sickness presenteeism determines job satisfaction via affective-motivational states. Social Science ve Medicine. 139. 100–106.
Kinman. G.. ve Wray. S. (2018). Presenteeism in academic employees—Occupational and individual factors. Occupational Medicine. 68(1). 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqx191
Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237
Küçükşen, K., & Saltalı, A. (2024). Do work stress, psychological resilience and workplace friendships predict presenteeism in healthcare workers? Journal of General Health Sciences, Necmettin Erbakan University. https://doi.org/10.51123/jgehes.2024.116
Lack. D. M. (2011). Presenteeism revisited: A comprehensive review. AAOHN Journal. 59(2). 77–91.
Li. Y.. Wu. J.. Liu. X.. Zhang. J.. Zhong. X.. ve He. L. (2023). Latent profile analysis and influence factors study of presenteeism among icu nurses in china. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259333
Liu, B., Lu, Q., Zhao, Y., & Zhan, J. (2020). Can the psychosocial safety climate reduce ill-health presenteeism? Evidence from Chinese healthcare staff under a dual information processing path lens. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082969
Lohaus, D., Habermann, W., Kertoubi, I., & Röser, F. (2021). Working while ill is not always bad: Positive effects of presenteeism. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.620918
Lohaus. D.. ve Habermann. W. (2019). Presenteeism: A review and research directions. Human Resource Management Review. 29(1). 43–58.
Lui, J. N. M., Andres, E. B., & Johnston, J. M. (2018). Presenteeism exposures and outcomes amongst hospital doctors and nurses: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3789-z
Miraglia, M., & Johns, G. (2016). Going to work ill: A meta-analysis of the correlates of presenteeism and a dual-path model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000015
Oluyemi. J. A.. Adejoke. J. A.. ve Deborah. A. (2019). Presenteeism in workplaces and its implications on employees’ health: Experiences of bankers in the Nigerian banking sector. Journal of Language. Technology ve Entrepreneurship in Africa. 10(1). 82–93.
Öztürk. Y.. ve Öztürk. A. (2023). İş güvencesizliği algısının presenteizm düzeyine etkisinde duygusal tükenmişliğin aracı rolü: Turizm sektörü çalışanlarına yönelik bir araştırma. Journal of Tourism ve Gastronomy Studies. 11(3). 2401–2417.
Pohling, R., Buruck, G., Jungbauer, K., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Work-related factors of presenteeism: The mediating role of mental and physical health. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039670
Prater. T.. ve Smith. K. (2011). Underlying factors contributing to presenteeism and absenteeism. Journal of Business ve Economics Research. 9(6). 1–14.
Rantanen. I. and Tuominen. R. (2010). Relative magnitude of presenteeism and absenteeism and work-related factors affecting them among health care professionals. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 84(2). 225-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-010-0604-5
Rebmann, T., Turner, J. A., & Kunerth, A. K. (2016). Presenteeism attitudes and behavior among Missouri kindergarten to twelfth grade (K–12) school nurses. The Journal of School Nursing, 32(6), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840516637651
Rhodes. S. M.. ve Collins. S. K. (2015). The organizational impact of presenteeism. Radiology Management. 37(5). 27–32.
Song. I. (2024). Prevalence and risk factors of presenteeism during the covid-19 pandemic in korea: analysis of population-based panel data. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 37(6). 617-629. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02490
Şahan, S., & Yıldız, A. (2020). Determining the relationship between presenteeism and organizational support in nursing. International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 5(3), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.778017
Şeremet. G. G.. Öztürk. Z.. ve Yılık. P. (2023). Sağlık çalışanlarının presenteizm (işte var olmama) algıları ile motivasyonları arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi. 58(2). 1342–1358.
Şimşek. A.. ve Yıldırım. A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayınevi.
Tabachnick. B. G.. ve Fidell. L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
Uslukaya. A.. Demirtaş. Z.. ve Alanoğlu. M. (2022). Perceived-teacher presenteeism scale: A scale development study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 848–866.
Wang, M., Lu, C., & Lu, L. (2022). The positive potential of presenteeism: An exploration of how presenteeism leads to good performance evaluation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(6), 920–935. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2604
Webster, R. K., Liu, R., Karimullina, K., Hall, I., Amlôt, R., & Rubin, G. J. (2019). A systematic review of infectious illness presenteeism: Prevalence, reasons and risk factors. BMC Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7138-x
Widera, E., Chang, A., & Chen, H. L. (2010). Presenteeism: A public health hazard. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(11), 1244–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1422-x
Widera. E.. Chang. A.. ve Chen. H. L. (2010). Presenteeism: A public health hazard. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 25. 1244–1247.
Yang, T., Zhu, M., & Xie, X. (2016). The determinants of presenteeism: A comprehensive investigation of stress-related factors at work, health, and individual factors among the aging workforce. Journal of Occupational Health, 58(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.15-0114-oa
Yelboğa. A. (2009). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS). World Applied Sciences Journal. 6(8). 1066–1072.
Yılmaz. S.. ve Söyük. S. (2024). Literatürde tartışmalı bir kavram: Presenteeism. Sağlık Akademisi Kastamonu. 9(1). 196–215.
Telif Hakkı (c) 2025 Yönetim ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
İndir
Makale Bilgileri
- Makale Türü Makaleler
- Gönderildi Aralık 30, 2025
- Yayınlanmış Aralık 30, 2025
- Sayı Cilt 4 Sayı 4 (2025): JMEDUSCI
- Bölüm Makaleler
